|
What Is Truth and Does It
Matter? part 2
Four major worldviews
It may be helpful to begin by giving a brief summary of four important
worldviews that are prominent in the world today. A "worldview" is a way of
thinking about truth and reality. It sums up the basic conclusions about life and meaning
that a person figures out and lives by, either consciously or unconsciously. James Sire,
in The Universe Next Door, gives the following definition of
"worldview":
A world view is a set of presuppositions
(assumptions which may be true, partially true or entirely false) which we hold
(consciously or subconsciously, consistently or inconsistently) about the basic
make-up of our world.
Or we could simply say it is the sum total of what we believe
about the most important issues of life.
Sire suggests the following seven questions we can ask
ourselves in determining our own particular worldview. In summary, they are as follows:
- What is prime reality—the really real?
To this we might answer: God, the gods, or the material universe.
- What is the nature of external reality, that is, the
world around us?
Do we see the world as created or autonomous, as chaotic or orderly, as matter or spirit?
Do we emphasise our subjective, personal relationship to the world or its objectivity
apart from us?
- What is a human being?
Are we highly complex machines, sleeping gods, people made in the image of God, or
"naked apes"?
- What happens to a person at death?
Is it personal extinction, transformation to a higher state, or departure to a shadowy
existence on "the other side"?
- Why is it possible to know anything at all?
Sample answers include the idea that we are made in the image of an all-knowing God or
that consciousness and intelligence have developed under the pressures of survival in a
long process of evolution.
- How do we know what is right and wrong?
Is it because we are made in the image of God whose character is good? Are right and
wrong determined by human choice alone? Or have the notions simply developed under the
pressures of cultural and physical survival?
- What is the meaning of human history?
Is it to realise the purposes of God or the gods, to make a paradise on earth, to
prepare people for a life in community with a loving and holy God, or something else?
Whatever answers we give to such questions will obviously
have a big effect on such matters as our goals in life—how we make decisions; the way we
treat other people; the way we value ourselves; our attitude to material possessions; the
way we face death; what we think is wrong with the world and how we are going to put it
right; how we relate to human need, to family structure, to those outside our own
community, to human rights, or to government. Though recognising that what we say we
believe and how we behave do not always match up, our actions often point clearly
to what we really believe.
With these questions in mind, let's have a brief look at what
are perhaps the major worldviews that people hold in this modem world. It is important to
note that the following summaries are extremely brief and you may well think simplistic.
Certainly we could find variations on each of them. However, I give them here in order to
underline the fact that they are different and that these differences cannot but
affect the way we live. Some tend to pick bits that appeal to them from two or more of
these worldviews and end up with a hotch-potch of beliefs, but this is usually the result
of not thinking deeply enough about the issues. If, indeed, one of them should be true and
the others false, then which one we choose to go with cannot but have important
consequences, both for the present and the future.
Samuel Johnson, the essayist and dictionary-maker of the
eighteenth century, said: "Truth, sir, is a cow; which, when skeptics have found it
will give them no more milk, they have gone off to milk the bull." But milking the
buff is not only futile. It can be positively dangerous to one's health!
1 There is no God—or
gods. Atheistic materialism
Reality
This material universe is what is
really real. As Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and populariser of science puts it, "The
cosmos is all that is or all that ever will be." The present scientific view of how
the universe came into being, now taught in major universities worldwide, is that it all
came into existence with a "big bang" some billions of years ago. The atheist
would say this was initiated by some physical process as yet unknown. [For a look at the
development of the Big Bang theory, and its implications for Christian beliefs, see my
booklet The Complementary Nature of Science and Christianity.]
Humans
Human consciousness and intelligence developed from
chemicals by a long process of chance evolution. Personality developed from impersonal
hydrogen atoms. "God is the DNA code," says Timothy Leary. We are all the
products of matter, time and chance alone.
How do we know things?
Knowledge is the result of physical processes in our
brains. A problem here was well expressed by Professor Haldane as follows: "If my
mental processes are determined wholly by the motion of atoms in my brain, I have no
reason to suppose that my beliefs are true ... and hence I have no reason for supposing my
brain to be composed of atoms." If my self-awareness, intelligence and ability to
make choices is something more than just the movement of atoms in my brain, then,
according to the materialist view, this self-awareness has somehow come about only as the
result of physical processes.
Meaning
As there is no intelligent being who planned it all, life only has
what meaning we humans choose to give it. Some would give it no meaning. Samuel Beckett's
play Breath is a 35-second play that has no human actors. The props are a pile of
rubbish on the stage, lit by a fight which begins to dim, brightens (but never fully) and
then recedes to dimness. There are no words, only a "recorded" cry opening the
play, an inhaled breath, an exhaled breath and an identical "recorded" cry
closing the play. For Beckett life is such a "breath".
Death
Death is the end of our personal existence—blotto!
"Human destiny," Ernest Nagel confesses in Naturalism Reconsidered,
"[is] an episode between two oblivions."
Morality and values
Right and wrong are merely what we decide for ourselves as
humans, either individually or in groups. Usually it is the majority decision that wins
the day.
History
History has no ultimate purpose. We have to
make the most of what we have got. In the end, this planet will certainly burn up or
freeze and that will be the end of everything.
————————
Atheism is a relative newcomer to the historical scene in any
significant measure, but now appears to be in decline. Statistician David Barrett says
that since 1970 the number of atheists has dropped from 4.6% of world population to 3.8%
(222 million). He predicts continuing decline.
2
Hinduism, Buddhism and New Age thinking
It is obviously simplistic to lump Hinduism and Buddhism
together, but they do have certain basic beliefs in common. New Age thinking tends to be
an adaption of some of these Eastern beliefs to Western culture.
Reality
Everything is God. We all share the same essence or
"stuff " of reality, which is spirit (Hinduism—the Brahma; Buddhism—Nirvana).
This philosophy of the unity of all things has been called Monism. The basic philosophy of
New Age thinking has been summed up in three pithy sayings: 'All is God", 'All is
one" and 'All is well". The New Age concept of God is impersonal, usually
described as Force, Energy, Essence, Consciousness, Vibration, Principle, or Being.
Matter
This material world is unreal, a sort of fantasy or dream
of some kind. The "realised soul" understands that this world means nothing and
is of no value. Ultimately, salvation consists in escaping from matter. New Agers tend to
put a little more value on this world than do Hindus and Buddhists.
Humans
We are one with God. Our unity with all reality is
emphasised. Individual personality is underplayed.
Meaning
Meaning in life comes through realising who we
are in our oneness with the divine spirit. There are no criteria for judging true from
false religious experience. "I believe" tends to become "I feel".
How we know truth
Our significant learning comes from withdrawal
from the world, looking within, getting in touch with our real selves, the divine within.
Hinduism, Buddhism and New Age share a distrust of reason. In Hinduism and Buddhism the
Ultimate is unknown and unknowable. It is neti neti, 'not this, not that'.
Morality
Sin is merely ignorance of the true nature of
reality. We need enlightenment, not repentance. Suffering rather than evil is seen as our
major problem, and much of Hindu and Buddhist philosophy is a response to this. For some,
there is no objective standard of right and wrong. As one spiritual sage from India put
it, "It's not a question of whether you are good or bad ... good and bad are
relative. They are two sides of one coin, part of the same whole." In a similar vein,
Carl Frederick wrote in Playing the Game the New Way, "You are the supreme
being ... there isn't any right or wrong." New Age guru Shirley Maclaine's
philosophy, along with that of many other New Agers, could be summed up as: "If it
feels good, do it."
Death
We die only to be reborn in a continuous cycle of
rebirth-reincamation. In our next fife we will endure the consequences of our behaviour in
this one—the Eastern doctrine of Karma. If we succeed in progressing in the steps of
enlightenment we will eventually escape this cycle into Nirvana where individual
personality will be absorbed into complete oneness with Ultimate Reality, like a wave
being absorbed back into the ocean. Much of Buddhism denies the personal nature of God.
New Age thinkers tend to be a little more optimistic about our continuous advance in this
process than do Hindus and Buddhists.
History
Because we are caught up in this constant cycle of
rebirth, history has little meaning. Eastern religion tends not to understand the world in
terms of purpose. As someone has said, there is "movement and change without
involving the idea of purpose."
—————-
In this worldview the focus tends to be on self, how we can
improve ourselves, rather than on how we can know God, and better serve him and others. A
typical statement from a popular New Age magazine says: "All paths lead to God. The
true path finally becomes self empowerment: the path of self-love. Then one demonstrates
that they can manifest God and no longer need to look outside themselves for this
information. They have become the path themselves."
3 Postmodernism
Postmodernism is the term used by sociologists and others
to describe a way of thinking that has become very pervasive in the Western world over the
last generation. It is an approach to reality that is having a significant effect on
literature, theatre, art, education, psychotherapy, law, science, architecture, the study
of history and people's view of religion. Some significant writers who have promoted
postmodernism are de Man, Geoffrey Hartman, Harold Bloom, J. Hillis Miller, Jean-Francois
Lytard, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida and Richard Rorty. Its origins are found in the
philosophies of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Marx and Freud. On some points, particularly its
attitude to truth, it is similar to New Age thinking. As a way of thinking it can hardly
be described as a "worldview", as one of its tenets is that there is no longer
any one big story that is able to make sense of our little stories. In other words,
"worldviews" are out!
Reality
We all create our own reality. God tends to be ignored.
Should he (she, it?) exist, he certainly has nothing to say about what we should believe
or how we should behave.
Truth and reason
There is no absolute truth. New Age guru Shirley MacLaine
holds a typical postmodern perspective. In Out on a Limb she asks David, her
spiritual guide, if he believes in reincarnation. He replies, "It's true if you
believe it, and that goes for anything." As Wheaton College professor Roger Lundin
explains in The Culture of Interpretation, in postmodernism "all principles
are preferences—and only preferences." As a result, "they are nothing but masks
for the will to power." Postmodernism is distrustful of all authority and dogmatism.
It often recasts the Enlightenment's sacred cows of reason and science as tools of
oppression. Feminist scholar Sandra Harding complains that science embodies a male-centred
view that is "culturally coercive."
Emotions, feelings, intuition, reflection, magic, myth,
and mystical experience are now centre stage. "I know" has been replaced by
"I feel". There is a bluffing of the difference between ourselves and the real
world out there.
The postmodern aversion to truth is well expressed by Allan
Bloom in The Closing of the American Mind.
The danger... is not error but intolerance. Relativism is
necessary to openness; and this is the virtue, the only virtue, which all primary
education for more tban fifty years bas dedicated itself to [teaching].
Openness—and the relativism that makes it the only plausible stance in the face of
various claims to truth and the various ways of life and kinds of human beings—is
the great insight of our times. Tbe true believer is the real danger. Tbe study of
history and of culture teaches that all the world was mad in the past; men always
thought they were right, and that led to wars, persecutions, slavery, xenophobia,
racism and chauvinism. Tbe point is not to correct the mistakes and really be
right; rather it is not to think that you are right at all.
Sigmund Freud had described this outcome with glaring
precision nearly one hundred years ago:
Fundamentally, we only find what we need and only see what
we want to see. We have no other possibility. Since the criterion for
truth—correspondence with the external world—is absent, it is entirely a matter
of indifference what opinions we adopt. All of them are equally true and equally
false. And no one has the right to accuse anyone else of error.
Someone has said that we have now moved from the conviction
that everyone has a right to his own opinions, to the notion that every opinion is equally
right!
Religion
Postmodernism does not rule out religion as
did modernism, with its emphasis on human reason. However, the religions that are approved
are very different from Christianity. You may believe what you want to. Go for what makes
you feel good. Religion is cafeteria style. You choose what you like from what is spread
in front of you, and put a meal together that suits your taste. There are strong links
with paganism.
Morality
All moral values are relative. Each person or culture
develops their own moral values. The important question is not "Is it right?"
but "What will it do for me?" There is a strong emphasis on the fact that we are
shaped by our culture, and a consequent diminishing of personal responsibility.
Tolerance
Tolerance of other views is one of the pillars of
postmodernism. However, there is one group of people to whom this tolerance is not
extended, those who believe truth to be important! This intolerance is especially directed
to those who think others might be wrong. Postmodern analyst Frederick Turner, for
instance, in The Future of the Gods: Notes Towards a Postmodern Religion, calls
for tolerance and syncretism (mixing different religions together). Yet, in the same
article he calls evangelical Christianity a "junk religion"!
Individualism
There is a strong emphasis on individualism. In the
American court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey, in justifying the abortion license, the
court declared that it is up to each individual to determine "the concept of
existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life."
History
There is much rewriting of history. What really happened is
either unknowable or unimportant. A sad symptom of this is seen in a survey indicating
that 33% of Americans subscribed to the view that the Holocaust, the killing of six
million Jews by the Nazis during World War II, may never have happened.
—————-
A good summary of postmodern thinking is given by Os Guinness
in Fit Bodies, Fat Minds.
Where modernism was a manifesto of human
self-confidence and self-congratulation, postmodernism is a confession of modesty, if not
despair. There is no truth, only truths. There are no principles, only preferences. There
is no grand reason, only reasons. There is no privileged civilization, only a multiple of
cultures, beliefs, periods, and styles. There is no grand narrative of human progress,
only countless stories of where people and their cultures are now. There is no simple
reality or any grand objectivity of universal, detached knowledge, only a ceaseless
representation of everything in terms of everything else. In sum, postmodernism ... is an
extreme form of relativism.
William Dever, in an excellent article in Near Eastern
Archeology on some writer's approach to history, and archeology in particular, says:
Such "post modern" thinking has affected nearly
all disciplines since [about] 1950, both in the natural and social
sciences, to such an extent that it is now taken for granted as the reigning paradigm.
4
Christianity
There is one God of infinite wisdom, holiness and power, who
has existed eternally. God is personal and exists within himself as three persons, Father,
Son and Holy Spirit that have always existed in a love relationship. [I have summarised
the Bible understanding of the Trinity, and the logic for it, in my booklet Understanding
the Trinity. Jews and Muslims also believe in the existence of one God. Because of the
limited purpose of this booklet I have chosen not to include their beliefs, and the
similarities and differences of their views to Christianity.]
Matter
The universe is the creation of this God and is dependent
on him for its existence. It had a beginning and, in its present form, will have an end.
Matter is real and good. God himself shared in created human nature in the person of Jesus
Christ. Though God maintains the created universe, he is distinct from it. He himself is
beyond space and time.
Humans
God has created humans "in his
own likeness" with self-consciousness, freedom to make choices, moral accountability,
intelligence, and spiritual qualities that enable us to relate personally to him. [I have
dealt with issues such as the creation of humans, their place in the universe and their
distinction from the animal world in the booklet The Complementary Nature of
Science and Christianity.] His desire is that we should enter into the loving
relationships that already exist within the persons of the divine Trinity, and enjoy
fellowship with him, both in this life and through eternity. We have messed things up by
our waywardness, but he has acted in Jesus Christ to restore that fellowship. More of that
later.
Death
We exist beyond death, either in a relationship with God
or without him, depending on choices we have made in this life. Because the material
creation matters to God, our bodies will be resurrected at Christ's Second Coming, though
in a transformed state similar to Christ's resurrected body.
How do we know the nature of reality?
God has given us intelligence which he expects
us to use, whether in our understanding of the universe or our knowledge of him. However,
our moral perversity affects our ability to think clearly, especially when it comes to
truth about spiritual matters. Truth about God, the meaning of life and death, and such
matters, come to us by revelation. In other words, God reveals this truth to those humble
enough to receive it.
Morality
Because God is perfectly good, he created humans with the
same qualities of moral goodness. However, humans have misused the freedom given them, and
our moral natures have become warped. Our goodness is tainted with "sin" and
this affects our relationship with God, whose justice demands the condemnation of evil.
History
God makes his purposes known in history. It is "his
story". He has made himself known by his actions in history and by revealing himself
to chosen individuals, and particularly by entering the world in the person of Jesus
Christ. History had a beginning and will culminate in the return of Jesus Christ, whom he
has appointed as judge of the human race. God will ultimately create "a new heavens
and a new earth" in which his people will live eternally in a loving and joyful
relationship with him.
To the next part of this booklet
Copyright 1999 Dick Tripp, Lyttelton, New Zealand

|